Details

Toggle open/close

Jean Sibelius

Pelléas and Mélisande

John Storgårds, conductor

The Symbolist playwright Maurice Maeterlinck’s Pelléas et Mélisande received its first performance in May 1893 and met with instant success. The play, which tells the tale of the forbidden and ultimately ill-fated love of the title characters, was popular not only with the general public, but particularly among the European culturati. Within twelve years, Pelléas spawned significant works by no fewer than four of Western music’s most prominent composers. Gabriel Fauré composed incidental music (a score to accompany a performance of the play) in 1898. Claude Debussy followed in 1902 with his opera of the same title, which stands as the play’s most famous musical adaptation. Arnold Schoenberg’s tone poem on Pelléas, completed in 1903, offers a decidedly different from that of his French contemporaries. Finally, in 1905, the Finnish composer Jean Sibelius would undertake to provide his own suite of incidental music to Maeterlinck’s play.

Published as Sibelius’s Opus 46, Pelléas och Mélisande comprises a series of vivid vignettes. Designed to accompany a theatrical performance of the play, the suite is equally effective in concert performance, distilling the composer’s own reaction to the play into a purely abstract musical conception with a compelling narrative quality of its own.

Sibelius’s score begins “At the Castle Gate”: The grand, sweeping gestures of this opening serve as a spellbinding curtain raiser. A magisterial sequence of broadly spaced chords demonstrates Sibelius’s supremacy in the realm of orchestral music. (His seven symphonies, representing the spinal column of his oeuvre, stand alongside those of Mahler and Bruckner as the most significant of the post-Romantic era.) The massive orchestral sonority achieved in these opening measures is all the more remarkable considering Sibelius’s modest, chamber orchestra-sized scoring. Midway through this introduction, violin pizzicati animate the sustained chords in the winds and brass, evoking “the sun rising over the sea.”

The second movement, “Mélisande,” introduces one of Maeterlinck’s title characters with an English horn solo, to be played espressivo e semplice. A short but intensely vivid intermezzo, “At the Seashore,” follows, portraying still but troubled waters: rumbling dectuplets in the first violins amidst the stillness point the music towards a fortissimo outburst, which proceeds without pause to “A Spring in the Park.” This music, by contrast, is simple and lyrical—yet something peculiar lurks in the melody. (Note the strangely chilling effect of the simplest of gestures: a hit of the triangle on each downbeat.) That sense of something lying in wait beneath the surface is fulfilled by the sudden change in character at the movement’s midpoint, affected by dark harmonies in the low strings.

An ominous timpani roll begins the fifth movement, “The Three Blind Sisters,” prefacing another English horn solo. Pallid chords in the clarinets above an octave pedal in the horns follow—an ingeniously conceived representation, in musical terms, of blindness—soon accented by string pizzicati. The clarinets remain in the foreground in the sixth movement Pastorale, commencing a series of tranquil wind melodies, set above gossamer string textures.

“Mélisande at the Spinning Wheel” steeply heightens the drama. Whirling melodies and a nervous half-step tremolo in the violas depict, quite clearly, Mélisande’s spinning wheel. But this music suggests a psychological turbulence, contrary to the ostensibly mundane domesticity of the scene.

Sibelius provides Maeterlinck’s play with an Entr’acte of bright effervescence. Given its function in theatrical performance—as a second curtain-raiser, to be heard on its own rather than as soundtrack—this movement fittingly contains the suite’s most extroverted music. The suite’s final movement is its most substantial, and also its most poignant, portraying “The Death of Mélisande” with tragic gravitas.

Patrick Castillo ©2014

Toggle open/close

Frank Martin

Violin Concerto

John Storgårds, conductor
Baiba Skride, violin

Twentieth-century Swiss composer Frank Martin’s musical identity remains, four decades after his death, elusive. His compositional voice, while deeply personal, developed over an unusually long span, making it impossible to categorize him with any particular school or aesthetic, or even to draw comparisons with any of his contemporaries. Martin’s own words perhaps best capture the essence of his art: “Whatever the movements of the soul, the spirit, the sensibility that are manifested in one’s work, and whether the state is one of anguish or even despair, one’s art inevitably bears the sign of… this liberation, this sublimation which evokes in us a finished form, and which is, I think, what is called ‘beauty.’”

Martin’s Violin Concerto guides the listener through a richly varied emotive landscape, resulting, indeed, in a work of ravishing and intricate beauty. Its language is primarily tonal, though it was composed in a period when the musical elite regarded tonality as woefully passé. (Martin completed the Concerto in 1951, the year of Schoenberg’s death.) However, hold their noses though the avant-garde du jour might have, the work today retains an alluring freshness and piquancy. (In fact, over the course of his career, Martin did incorporate, among other influences—ranging from ancient music to Bach, Schumann, Chopin, and Franck, and even traditional Indian and Bulgarian music—Schoenberg’s twelve-tone technique into his compositional language. But his use of twelve-tone technique, as in, for example, his First Piano Concerto, Rhapsodie for five strings, and other works, never strictly follows that of Schoenberg, whose innovations Martin respected, but whose aesthetics he ultimately rejected.)

The Concerto’s first movement Allegro tranquillo begins with enchanting, dream-like music. Its puckish opening melody, scored for flutes, harp, and strings, seems to summon Mendelssohn’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, but filtered through a twentieth-century sensibility. (As it happens, the Concerto’s aesthetic character derives from another Shakespearean tale; see below.) From the solo violin’s first entrance, the temperature steadily rises towards an extended, impassioned cadenza—after which, the sinewy, chromatic melody of the Concerto’s opening reappears, transfigured: slowed to half-tempo, and set in the strings alone, sans flute and harp. It is as though the blood has drained from the movement’s face, as the violin intones its final utterance.

The enigmatic mood that ends the Allegro tranquillo carries over into the second movement. Martin sets an inscrutable melody, like weird plainchant, to the plangent palette of oboes, bassoons, and cellos in octaves, accented by the harp. The solo violin writing here is marked by a parlando rhetorical quality; the soloist engages in fragments of dialogue with different groups of instruments in turn. A march of steady, assertive eighth notes, outlining a wildly disjunct melodic contour, signals the movement’s climax; as this music subsides, a specter of the first movement appears. Fragments of the Concerto’s sinewy opening melody—barely recognizable, but for its setting in flutes, harp, and strings—stagger towards the movement’s quiet final measures, marked perdendosi (dying away).

The Concerto’s Presto finale is at once lithe and muscular, conjuring the image of a dancer’s lean physique. A persistent, repeated staccato sixteenth-note figure triggers the Concerto’s most extroverted music, impelling the music inexorably to its cinematic ending.

Martin composed his Violin Concerto for Hansheinz Schneeberger, a leading virtuoso of his day, who also premiered Béla Bartók’s First Concerto. On the occasion of the work’s premiere, Martin offered the following introduction:

I would gladly continue to enlarge on the merits of the Basle Chamber Orchestra and its conductor rather than talk about my concerto. Indeed, there is not much to say about the piece beyond what is already contained and designated in its title. In fact I used every effort within my powers to write a proper concerto in three distinct parts—Allegro, Andante, Presto. It was to be a symphonic piece, but one led and inspired by a solo instrument, while serving to place on display the idiomatic qualities of the instrument and its player. This is nothing very new, of course, but it did not prevent some of these exigencies from seeming at times strangely contradictory to the composer. If I have adopted the traditional shape of the concerto, it was not from vain solicitude for neoclassicism, whatever that might mean. It is simply that I wanted to write a quite large and elaborate work (roughly half an hour of music), and I quickly realized that the classical shape of the concerto meets certain prerequisites of the genre; for example, there must be tuttis contrasting with solo passages in order for the orchestra to deploy its full strength at times and in order for the soloist to reenter to advantage. Similarly, the three-movement design is not in itself arbitrary, any more than the linking of the second and the third movements was imposed upon me against my original wish.

I began my Violin Concerto immediately after finishing the Cinqs Chansons d’Ariel (for mixed a cappella chorus after Shakespeare’s The Tempest). It therefore retained, especially at the opening, the same mysterious and slightly elfin atmosphere; it even borrows from it a motif introduced by the horns in bar 16. Other elements of a more lyrical, even pathetic character intervene, but the figure of Ariel always reappears in fresh guise, mysteriously distant at the end of the first movement and the entrance of the violin in the second, or sprightly and whimsical as at the opening of the finale. Yet there is nothing contrived about this: I simply remained slightly enchanted by the delights of Prospero’s isle.

Patrick Castillo ©2014

Toggle open/close
Listen to Audio

Ludwig van Beethoven

Symphony No. 5

John Storgårds, conductor

They are the most recognizable four notes in all of music.

But what do they mean?

“Fate knocking at the door,” some, familiar with the legend of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, will answer. And, yes, that notion captures the awesome effect of that notorious motif quite precisely. But those four notes, so pregnant with significance, herald something even mightier. In 1803, Beethoven declared, “I am not satisfied with what I have composed up to now. From now on I intend to embark on a new path.” Four years later, the new direction of Beethoven’s artistic pursuits would be made manifest in resounding fashion in the sea-parting Fifth.

It must be stated at the outset that that consequential motif—Da-da-da-daaaa…—is not much of a melody. And, realizing this, one might consider the question, Well, then, what does make Beethoven so great? If not his melodies, perhaps his harmonies. (But think of the harmonic simplicity of the “Ode to Joy.”) Not his harmonies, then, but, presaging the likes of Stravinsky and Messiaen, it must be his rhythmic creativity. (But, the Allegretto of the Seventh Symphony.) Nothing groundbreaking in Beethoven’s approach to rhythm. What, then? His counterpoint? orchestration?

No, what makes Beethoven Beethoven has not to do with the musical idea itself, but with what he does with the musical idea. Hear, in the Fifth, the immensity of that four-note motif: never had such a compact gesture been deployed to such thrilling effect. It serves as the foundational building block of the tautly dramatic Allegro con brio—a movement of remarkably limited harmonic range. From C minor—the Symphony’s home key, and more broadly, the customary key of Beethoven’s darkest moods—the work proceeds to E-flat major for the lyrical second theme (still underpinned by those incessant four notes); the subsequent development section oscillates between C minor and F minor, with only a brief moment in G major, and otherwise hardly any major chords at all. This spartan harmonic setting serves only to sharpen the pointed intensity of the movement’s germinal four-note motif. “The dominating motto and the rhythmic and harmonic compression create the force behind the first movement,” writes Lewis Lockwood, “which unleashes a tragic power in the symphonic domain that audiences had not known before.”

Those four notes are the DNA, not only of the opening movement, but, indeed, of the entire Symphony, appearing in various guises in each of its four movements. Stripped of its upbeats and ornaments, the lyrical first theme of the Andante con moto follows the same short-short-short-long pattern; if not immediately evident there, the regal second theme, set fortissimo in the oboes, trumpets, and horns, brings the rhythmic motif into clear focus. The third movement Scherzo presents an even purer distillation of the four-note motif, presenting it with a martial sternness.

The passage from the Scherzo into the Finale represents one of Beethoven’s most breathtaking compositional accomplishments. The Scherzo’s forceful carriage diminishes to a pianississimo whisper, and a hushed tension builds as the strings sustain a dominant pedal; an overwhelming crescendo explodes in an incandescent C major at the arrival of Symphony’s concluding Allegro.

Beethoven’s use of that four-note rhythmic motif to bind the Symphony’s four movements together contributes to the work’s sense of narrative unity (a quality which places the Fifth Symphony alongside the Sixth, the Pastoral, a musical journey of equally imaginative conception, and which was premiered on the same evening). The Fifth Symphony’s declamatory strength—that quintessentially Beethovenian quality of empowering the music to say something—signals the fulfillment of the “new path” to which Beethoven aspired at the dawn of the nineteenth century, and has installed this symphony as arguably the most iconic work in the classical repertoire. The nineteenth-century critic E.T.A. Hoffmann wrote, “How this magnificent composition carries the listener on and on in a continually ascending climax into the ghostly world of infinity! … [T]he human breast, squeezed by monstrous presentiments and destructive powers, seems to gasp for breath; soon a kindly figure approaches full of radiance, and illuminates the depths of terrifying night.”

Patrick Castillo ©2014

About This Program

Approximate length 2:00

Heralded as “one of the great Sibelians of our day,” (The Telegraph) conductor John Storgårds returns to the podium to lead the SPCO in a performance of Sibelius’s stately Pelléas and Mélisande. Baiba Skride makes her SPCO debut with Swiss composer Frank Martin’s Violin Concerto. Skride has been praised for playing with “panache and with a release of wonders of emotion, subtlety and virtuosity” (Ouest France). The program closes with Beethoven’s unyieldingly powerful Fifth Symphony.

This concert is part of our complete Beethoven symphony cycle.

Metro Transit

Metro Transit is pleased to offer free rides to all October SPCO concerts. If you have tickets to October concerts, watch your email for a concert reminder including a link to download your free Metro Transit pass.

Contribute

SPCO concerts are made possible by audience contributions.

Newsletter

For exclusive discounts, behind-the-scenes info, and more:
Sign up for our email club!